|
|
|
Instructor Helps
This paper deals with one aspect of
ethnoarchaeology, namely the tribal aspects of the social
and political organization of Near Eastern society. Its
starting point is that tribalism has always been a major
factor in the society, and its influence on that society is
demonstrated using the Karak Plateau in the 18th and 19th
century as a case study. The paper can be
used as a case study by teachers of ethnoarchaeology in order to
clarify the social organization of a tribal society, and ask the
question whether there are traces in the archaeological record
that suggest this presence in other periods. Some material
remains to look for are: development of settlement patterns and
distribution of cultural traits (architecture and possibly
pottery). Some periods provide ample written sources (Late
Bronze and Iron Ages, Roman and Byzantine period for example)
can also provide valuable evidence.
-
The first question to ask here is of
course: is this comparison justified? Can we compare
pre-modern bedouin and tribal societies with the distant
past? Finding and formulating arguments in favour and
against this thesis would specify the issue and inevitably
generate related questions.
-
Further study of the historical sources
(travel accounts and 19th century ethnographic sources)
aimed at specific themes can be used to search for
comparable parallels that may help interpret archaeological
remains. Possible subjects to study could be:
-
The development over time of one
specific tribe, the way its territory changes and its
interaction with other tribes. The Beni Sakhr or the
Howeitat are very suitable for this purpose, but there
are numerous others.
-
The influence of major international
events on the social and tribal structure of the region.
A possible case study would be the changes in territory
and power after each change in government in the Islamic
period, starting with the Islamic conquest, and the
Abassid, Fatimid, Ayyubid, Mamluk and Ottoman takeovers.
This may then be used to gain insight into the effects
on society of major political events in the distant
past, and to explain the historical record from that
point of view.
|
|
|
|
|

|
|

|
|